Skip to content
uswages .org

Budget Analysts Salary: Ames, IA vs Ann Arbor, MI

Budget Analysts earn a median of $84,030 in Ames, IA and $127,860 in Ann Arbor, MI. That is a nominal gap of $43,830 (-34.3%), with Ann Arbor, MI paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$84,030
Ames, IA median
$94,596 after COL
$127,860
Ann Arbor, MI median
$126,745 after COL
-34.3%
Nominal gap
Ann Arbor, MI leads
-25.4%
Adjusted gap
Ann Arbor, MI leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Ann Arbor, MI pays $43,830 more per year than Ames, IA for budget analysts, a gap of +34.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Ann Arbor, MI still comes out ahead, with roughly $32,148 of extra purchasing power (+25.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for budget analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Budget Analysts

Ames, IA

Median salary
$84,030
Mean salary
$82,450
Employment
80
Location quotient
4.44
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$94,596
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for Ames, IA →

Budget Analysts

Ann Arbor, MI

Median salary
$127,860
Mean salary
$117,690
Employment
90
Location quotient
1.42
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$126,745
Regional Price Parity
100.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for Ann Arbor, MI →

Related pages

Keep digging into budget analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.