Skip to content
uswages .org

Budget Analysts Salary: Michigan vs California

Budget Analysts earn a median of $96,430 in Michigan and $99,520 in California. That is a nominal gap of $3,090 (-3.1%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$96,430
Michigan median
$100,221 after COL
$99,520
California median
$89,884 after COL
-3.1%
Nominal gap
California leads
+11.5%
Adjusted gap
Michigan leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $3,090 more per year than Michigan for budget analysts, a gap of +3.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Michigan actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $10,337 more in national-price-level terms (a +11.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for budget analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Budget Analysts

Michigan

Median salary
$96,430
Mean salary
$102,500
Employment
1,020
Location quotient
0.76
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$100,221
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for Michigan →

Budget Analysts

California

Median salary
$99,520
Mean salary
$105,890
Employment
4,160
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$89,884
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Budget Analysts page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into budget analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.