Skip to content
uswages .org

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity Salary: California vs Hawaii

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity earn a median of $67,130 in California and $68,500 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $1,370 (-2.0%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$67,130
California median
$60,630 after COL
$68,500
Hawaii median
$62,300 after COL
-2.0%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-2.7%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $1,370 more per year than California for bus drivers, transit and intercity, a gap of +2.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,670 of extra purchasing power (+2.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bus drivers, transit and intercity in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

California

Median salary
$67,130
Mean salary
$66,930
Employment
24,380
Location quotient
1.31
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$60,630
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for California →

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Hawaii

Median salary
$68,500
Mean salary
$62,170
Employment
2,190
Location quotient
3.41
Jobs per 1,000
3.5
COL-adjusted median
$62,300
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into bus drivers, transit and intercity from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.