Skip to content
uswages .org

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity Salary: Illinois vs Washington

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity earn a median of $65,200 in Illinois and $72,280 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $7,080 (-9.8%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,200
Illinois median
$65,227 after COL
$72,280
Washington median
$67,543 after COL
-9.8%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-3.4%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $7,080 more per year than Illinois for bus drivers, transit and intercity, a gap of +9.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,316 of extra purchasing power (+3.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bus drivers, transit and intercity in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Illinois

Median salary
$65,200
Mean salary
$67,480
Employment
8,650
Location quotient
1.38
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$65,227
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Illinois →

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Washington

Median salary
$72,280
Mean salary
$73,650
Employment
6,960
Location quotient
1.92
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$67,543
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into bus drivers, transit and intercity from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.