Skip to content
uswages .org

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity Salary: Massachusetts vs Maryland

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity earn a median of $65,460 in Massachusetts and $65,220 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $240 (+0.4%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,460
Massachusetts median
$61,897 after COL
$65,220
Maryland median
$62,139 after COL
+0.4%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-0.4%
Adjusted gap
Maryland leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $240 more per year than Maryland for bus drivers, transit and intercity, a gap of +0.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Maryland actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $242 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.4% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bus drivers, transit and intercity in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Massachusetts

Median salary
$65,460
Mean salary
$70,760
Employment
3,970
Location quotient
1.07
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$61,897
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Massachusetts →

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Maryland

Median salary
$65,220
Mean salary
$67,990
Employment
4,890
Location quotient
1.73
Jobs per 1,000
1.8
COL-adjusted median
$62,139
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into bus drivers, transit and intercity from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.