Skip to content
uswages .org

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity Salary: New York vs Massachusetts

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity earn a median of $84,480 in New York and $65,460 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $19,020 (+29.1%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$84,480
New York median
$78,279 after COL
$65,460
Massachusetts median
$61,897 after COL
+29.1%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+26.5%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $19,020 more per year than Massachusetts for bus drivers, transit and intercity, a gap of +29.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,383 of extra purchasing power (+26.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bus drivers, transit and intercity in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

New York

Median salary
$84,480
Mean salary
$74,560
Employment
16,770
Location quotient
1.69
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$78,279
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for New York →

Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity

Massachusetts

Median salary
$65,460
Mean salary
$70,760
Employment
3,970
Location quotient
1.07
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$61,897
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bus Drivers, Transit And Intercity page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into bus drivers, transit and intercity from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.