Skip to content
uswages .org

Business Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Utah vs California

Business Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $115,870 in Utah and $128,470 in California. That is a nominal gap of $12,600 (-9.8%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$115,870
Utah median
$117,201 after COL
$128,470
California median
$116,031 after COL
-9.8%
Nominal gap
California leads
+1.0%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $12,600 more per year than Utah for business teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +9.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Utah actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,170 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for business teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Business Teachers, Postsecondary

Utah

Median salary
$115,870
Mean salary
$136,750
Employment
460
Location quotient
0.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$117,201
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Business Teachers, Postsecondary page for Utah →

Business Teachers, Postsecondary

California

Median salary
$128,470
Mean salary
$140,670
Employment
5,290
Location quotient
0.55
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$116,031
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Business Teachers, Postsecondary page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into business teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.