Skip to content
uswages .org

Butchers And Meat Cutters Salary: Massachusetts vs Oregon

Butchers And Meat Cutters earn a median of $48,430 in Massachusetts and $49,360 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $930 (-1.9%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,430
Massachusetts median
$45,794 after COL
$49,360
Oregon median
$47,755 after COL
-1.9%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-4.1%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $930 more per year than Massachusetts for butchers and meat cutters, a gap of +1.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,961 of extra purchasing power (+4.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for butchers and meat cutters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Butchers And Meat Cutters

Massachusetts

Median salary
$48,430
Mean salary
$49,210
Employment
1,480
Location quotient
0.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$45,794
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Butchers And Meat Cutters page for Massachusetts →

Butchers And Meat Cutters

Oregon

Median salary
$49,360
Mean salary
$49,610
Employment
1,540
Location quotient
0.89
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$47,755
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Butchers And Meat Cutters page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into butchers and meat cutters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.