Skip to content
uswages .org

Buyers And Purchasing Agents Salary: Colorado vs Virginia

Buyers And Purchasing Agents earn a median of $83,590 in Colorado and $89,210 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $5,620 (-6.3%), with Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$83,590
Colorado median
$81,114 after COL
$89,210
Virginia median
$88,236 after COL
-6.3%
Nominal gap
Virginia leads
-8.1%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Virginia pays $5,620 more per year than Colorado for buyers and purchasing agents, a gap of +6.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Virginia still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,121 of extra purchasing power (+8.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for buyers and purchasing agents in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Buyers And Purchasing Agents

Colorado

Median salary
$83,590
Mean salary
$91,410
Employment
10,080
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
3.5
COL-adjusted median
$81,114
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Buyers And Purchasing Agents page for Colorado →

Buyers And Purchasing Agents

Virginia

Median salary
$89,210
Mean salary
$95,090
Employment
22,120
Location quotient
1.70
Jobs per 1,000
5.4
COL-adjusted median
$88,236
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Buyers And Purchasing Agents page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into buyers and purchasing agents from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.