Skip to content
uswages .org

Cardiologists Salary: Nebraska vs Washington

Cardiologists earn a median of $646,300 in Nebraska and $656,330 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $10,030 (-1.5%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$646,300
Nebraska median
$717,290 after COL
$656,330
Washington median
$613,318 after COL
-1.5%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+17.0%
Adjusted gap
Nebraska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $10,030 more per year than Nebraska for cardiologists, a gap of +1.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nebraska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $103,972 more in national-price-level terms (a +17.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cardiologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cardiologists

Nebraska

Median salary
$646,300
Mean salary
$627,390
Employment
170
Location quotient
1.48
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$717,290
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cardiologists page for Nebraska →

Cardiologists

Washington

Median salary
$656,330
Mean salary
$562,160
Employment
200
Location quotient
0.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$613,318
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cardiologists page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into cardiologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.