Skip to content
uswages .org

Career/Technical Education Teachers, Middle School Salary: Connecticut vs Washington

Career/Technical Education Teachers, Middle School earn a median of $95,680 in Connecticut and $103,290 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $7,610 (-7.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$95,680
Connecticut median
$92,346 after COL
$103,290
Washington median
$96,521 after COL
-7.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-4.3%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $7,610 more per year than Connecticut for career/technical education teachers, middle school, a gap of +7.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,175 of extra purchasing power (+4.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for career/technical education teachers, middle school in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Career/Technical Education Teachers, Middle School

Connecticut

Median salary
$95,680
Mean salary
$90,610
Employment
120
Location quotient
0.63
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$92,346
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Career/Technical Education Teachers, Middle School page for Connecticut →

Career/Technical Education Teachers, Middle School

Washington

Median salary
$103,290
Mean salary
$101,520
Employment
720
Location quotient
1.87
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$96,521
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Career/Technical Education Teachers, Middle School page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into career/technical education teachers, middle school from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.