Skip to content
uswages .org

Carpenters Salary: Massachusetts vs Alaska

Carpenters earn a median of $75,200 in Massachusetts and $73,860 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $1,340 (+1.8%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$75,200
Massachusetts median
$71,106 after COL
$73,860
Alaska median
$72,158 after COL
+1.8%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-1.5%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $1,340 more per year than Alaska for carpenters, a gap of +1.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Alaska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,051 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for carpenters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Carpenters

Massachusetts

Median salary
$75,200
Mean salary
$79,680
Employment
18,540
Location quotient
1.18
Jobs per 1,000
5.1
COL-adjusted median
$71,106
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Carpenters page for Massachusetts →

Carpenters

Alaska

Median salary
$73,860
Mean salary
$80,460
Employment
2,560
Location quotient
1.82
Jobs per 1,000
7.8
COL-adjusted median
$72,158
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Carpenters page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into carpenters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.