Skip to content
uswages .org

Carpet Installers Salary: New Hampshire vs Alaska

Carpet Installers earn a median of $65,600 in New Hampshire and $76,790 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $11,190 (-14.6%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,600
New Hampshire median
$62,977 after COL
$76,790
Alaska median
$75,020 after COL
-14.6%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-16.1%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $11,190 more per year than New Hampshire for carpet installers, a gap of +14.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,043 of extra purchasing power (+16.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for carpet installers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Carpet Installers

New Hampshire

Median salary
$65,600
Mean salary
$66,460
Employment
60
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$62,977
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Carpet Installers page for New Hampshire →

Carpet Installers

Alaska

Median salary
$76,790
Mean salary
$70,380
Employment
70
Location quotient
2.35
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$75,020
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Carpet Installers page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into carpet installers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.