Skip to content
uswages .org

Cashiers Salary: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL vs Napa, CA

Cashiers earn a median of $29,900 in Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL and $38,500 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $8,600 (-22.3%), with Napa, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$29,900
Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL median
$30,780 after COL
$38,500
Napa, CA median
$34,206 after COL
-22.3%
Nominal gap
Napa, CA leads
-10.0%
Adjusted gap
Napa, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Napa, CA pays $8,600 more per year than Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL for cashiers, a gap of +22.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Napa, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,426 of extra purchasing power (+10.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cashiers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cashiers

Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL

Median salary
$29,900
Mean salary
$30,610
Employment
5,540
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
20.9
COL-adjusted median
$30,780
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL →

Cashiers

Napa, CA

Median salary
$38,500
Mean salary
$41,240
Employment
1,540
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
19.8
COL-adjusted median
$34,206
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into cashiers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.