Skip to content
uswages .org

Cashiers Salary: Nevada vs District of Columbia

Cashiers earn a median of $29,870 in Nevada and $38,880 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $9,010 (-23.2%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$29,870
Nevada median
$29,876 after COL
$38,880
District of Columbia median
$35,377 after COL
-23.2%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-15.5%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $9,010 more per year than Nevada for cashiers, a gap of +23.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,501 of extra purchasing power (+15.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cashiers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cashiers

Nevada

Median salary
$29,870
Mean salary
$32,630
Employment
30,160
Location quotient
0.98
Jobs per 1,000
19.4
COL-adjusted median
$29,876
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for Nevada →

Cashiers

District of Columbia

Median salary
$38,880
Mean salary
$42,370
Employment
6,060
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
8.6
COL-adjusted median
$35,377
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into cashiers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.