Skip to content
uswages .org

Cashiers Salary: Vermont vs Colorado

Cashiers earn a median of $35,720 in Vermont and $36,870 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $1,150 (-3.1%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$35,720
Vermont median
$36,465 after COL
$36,870
Colorado median
$35,778 after COL
-3.1%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
+1.9%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $1,150 more per year than Vermont for cashiers, a gap of +3.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $687 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cashiers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cashiers

Vermont

Median salary
$35,720
Mean salary
$35,950
Employment
7,030
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
23.1
COL-adjusted median
$36,465
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for Vermont →

Cashiers

Colorado

Median salary
$36,870
Mean salary
$38,220
Employment
51,670
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
18.0
COL-adjusted median
$35,778
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cashiers page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into cashiers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.