Skip to content
uswages .org

Chefs And Head Cooks Salary: South Carolina vs Washington

Chefs And Head Cooks earn a median of $71,860 in South Carolina and $76,010 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $4,150 (-5.5%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$71,860
South Carolina median
$76,651 after COL
$76,010
Washington median
$71,029 after COL
-5.5%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+7.9%
Adjusted gap
South Carolina leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $4,150 more per year than South Carolina for chefs and head cooks, a gap of +5.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. South Carolina actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $5,623 more in national-price-level terms (a +7.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for chefs and head cooks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Chefs And Head Cooks

South Carolina

Median salary
$71,860
Mean salary
$70,780
Employment
2,650
Location quotient
0.89
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$76,651
Regional Price Parity
93.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chefs And Head Cooks page for South Carolina →

Chefs And Head Cooks

Washington

Median salary
$76,010
Mean salary
$74,670
Employment
5,320
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$71,029
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chefs And Head Cooks page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into chefs and head cooks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.