Skip to content
uswages .org

Chemists Salary: Alaska vs Massachusetts

Chemists earn a median of $106,010 in Alaska and $125,000 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $18,990 (-15.2%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$106,010
Alaska median
$103,567 after COL
$125,000
Massachusetts median
$118,195 after COL
-15.2%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-12.4%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $18,990 more per year than Alaska for chemists, a gap of +15.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $14,629 of extra purchasing power (+12.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for chemists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Chemists

Alaska

Median salary
$106,010
Mean salary
$104,520
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.35
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$103,567
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemists page for Alaska →

Chemists

Massachusetts

Median salary
$125,000
Mean salary
$128,930
Employment
3,430
Location quotient
1.77
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$118,195
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chemists page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into chemists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.