Skip to content
uswages .org

Chiropractors Salary: Alaska vs Washington

Chiropractors earn a median of $103,500 in Alaska and $104,070 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $570 (-0.5%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$103,500
Alaska median
$101,115 after COL
$104,070
Washington median
$97,250 after COL
-0.5%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+4.0%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $570 more per year than Alaska for chiropractors, a gap of +0.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Alaska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,865 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for chiropractors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Chiropractors

Alaska

Median salary
$103,500
Mean salary
$120,280
Employment
90
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$101,115
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chiropractors page for Alaska →

Chiropractors

Washington

Median salary
$104,070
Mean salary
$102,930
Employment
1,130
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$97,250
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Chiropractors page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into chiropractors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.