Skip to content
uswages .org

Choreographers Salary: South Dakota vs Minnesota

Choreographers earn a median of $40,320 in South Dakota and $74,810 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $34,490 (-46.1%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$40,320
South Dakota median
$45,515 after COL
$74,810
Minnesota median
$75,856 after COL
-46.1%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-40.0%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $34,490 more per year than South Dakota for choreographers, a gap of +46.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $30,341 of extra purchasing power (+40.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for choreographers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Choreographers

South Dakota

Median salary
$40,320
Mean salary
$43,120
Employment
250
Location quotient
29.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$45,515
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Choreographers page for South Dakota →

Choreographers

Minnesota

Median salary
$74,810
Mean salary
$68,330
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$75,856
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Choreographers page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into choreographers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.