Skip to content
uswages .org

Choreographers Salary: Texas vs Minnesota

Choreographers earn a median of $46,460 in Texas and $74,810 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $28,350 (-37.9%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,460
Texas median
$47,869 after COL
$74,810
Minnesota median
$75,856 after COL
-37.9%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-36.9%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $28,350 more per year than Texas for choreographers, a gap of +37.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $27,987 of extra purchasing power (+36.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for choreographers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Choreographers

Texas

Median salary
$46,460
Mean salary
$47,050
Employment
380
Location quotient
1.49
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$47,869
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Choreographers page for Texas →

Choreographers

Minnesota

Median salary
$74,810
Mean salary
$68,330
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$75,856
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Choreographers page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into choreographers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.