Skip to content
uswages .org

Coaches And Scouts Salary: Connecticut vs Vermont

Coaches And Scouts earn a median of $54,790 in Connecticut and $59,990 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $5,200 (-8.7%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,790
Connecticut median
$52,881 after COL
$59,990
Vermont median
$61,241 after COL
-8.7%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-13.7%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $5,200 more per year than Connecticut for coaches and scouts, a gap of +8.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,360 of extra purchasing power (+13.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for coaches and scouts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Coaches And Scouts

Connecticut

Median salary
$54,790
Mean salary
$67,480
Employment
4,070
Location quotient
1.50
Jobs per 1,000
2.4
COL-adjusted median
$52,881
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Coaches And Scouts page for Connecticut →

Coaches And Scouts

Vermont

Median salary
$59,990
Mean salary
$65,930
Employment
630
Location quotient
1.29
Jobs per 1,000
2.1
COL-adjusted median
$61,241
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Coaches And Scouts page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into coaches and scouts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.