Skip to content
uswages .org

Coil Winders, Tapers, And Finishers Salary: Washington vs Alabama

Coil Winders, Tapers, And Finishers earn a median of $73,920 in Washington and $55,880 in Alabama. That is a nominal gap of $18,040 (+32.3%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,920
Washington median
$69,076 after COL
$55,880
Alabama median
$62,912 after COL
+32.3%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+9.8%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $18,040 more per year than Alabama for coil winders, tapers, and finishers, a gap of +32.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,164 of extra purchasing power (+9.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for coil winders, tapers, and finishers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Coil Winders, Tapers, And Finishers

Washington

Median salary
$73,920
Mean salary
$90,950
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.20
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$69,076
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Coil Winders, Tapers, And Finishers page for Washington →

Coil Winders, Tapers, And Finishers

Alabama

Median salary
$55,880
Mean salary
$53,630
Employment
420
Location quotient
2.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$62,912
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Coil Winders, Tapers, And Finishers page for Alabama →

Related pages

Keep digging into coil winders, tapers, and finishers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.