Skip to content
uswages .org

Commercial And Industrial Designers Salary: Kansas vs Massachusetts

Commercial And Industrial Designers earn a median of $104,870 in Kansas and $101,720 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $3,150 (+3.1%), with Kansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$104,870
Kansas median
$116,434 after COL
$101,720
Massachusetts median
$96,183 after COL
+3.1%
Nominal gap
Kansas leads
+21.1%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kansas pays $3,150 more per year than Massachusetts for commercial and industrial designers, a gap of +3.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,251 of extra purchasing power (+21.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for commercial and industrial designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Commercial And Industrial Designers

Kansas

Median salary
$104,870
Mean salary
$111,230
Employment
260
Location quotient
0.84
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$116,434
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Commercial And Industrial Designers page for Kansas →

Commercial And Industrial Designers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$101,720
Mean salary
$106,940
Employment
1,240
Location quotient
1.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$96,183
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Commercial And Industrial Designers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into commercial and industrial designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.