Skip to content
uswages .org

Commercial And Industrial Designers Salary: Washington vs Michigan

Commercial And Industrial Designers earn a median of $94,280 in Washington and $102,160 in Michigan. That is a nominal gap of $7,880 (-7.7%), with Michigan paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$94,280
Washington median
$88,101 after COL
$102,160
Michigan median
$106,177 after COL
-7.7%
Nominal gap
Michigan leads
-17.0%
Adjusted gap
Michigan leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Michigan pays $7,880 more per year than Washington for commercial and industrial designers, a gap of +7.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Michigan still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,075 of extra purchasing power (+17.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for commercial and industrial designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Commercial And Industrial Designers

Washington

Median salary
$94,280
Mean salary
$105,430
Employment
340
Location quotient
0.44
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$88,101
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Commercial And Industrial Designers page for Washington →

Commercial And Industrial Designers

Michigan

Median salary
$102,160
Mean salary
$98,110
Employment
2,930
Location quotient
3.09
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$106,177
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Commercial And Industrial Designers page for Michigan →

Related pages

Keep digging into commercial and industrial designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.