Skip to content
uswages .org

Community Health Workers Salary: Boulder, CO vs Eau Claire, WI

Community Health Workers earn a median of $65,780 in Boulder, CO and $78,090 in Eau Claire, WI. That is a nominal gap of $12,310 (-15.8%), with Eau Claire, WI paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,780
Boulder, CO median
$62,527 after COL
$78,090
Eau Claire, WI median
$84,152 after COL
-15.8%
Nominal gap
Eau Claire, WI leads
-25.7%
Adjusted gap
Eau Claire, WI leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Eau Claire, WI pays $12,310 more per year than Boulder, CO for community health workers, a gap of +15.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Eau Claire, WI still comes out ahead, with roughly $21,625 of extra purchasing power (+25.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for community health workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Community Health Workers

Boulder, CO

Median salary
$65,780
Mean salary
$67,870
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$62,527
Regional Price Parity
105.2%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Boulder, CO →

Community Health Workers

Eau Claire, WI

Median salary
$78,090
Mean salary
$65,950
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.14
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$84,152
Regional Price Parity
92.8%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Eau Claire, WI →

Related pages

Keep digging into community health workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.