Skip to content
uswages .org

Community Health Workers Salary: Nevada vs Hawaii

Community Health Workers earn a median of $57,730 in Nevada and $58,450 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $720 (-1.2%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$57,730
Nevada median
$57,742 after COL
$58,450
Hawaii median
$53,160 after COL
-1.2%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
+8.6%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $720 more per year than Nevada for community health workers, a gap of +1.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nevada actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $4,582 more in national-price-level terms (a +8.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for community health workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Community Health Workers

Nevada

Median salary
$57,730
Mean salary
$63,550
Employment
670
Location quotient
1.08
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$57,742
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Nevada →

Community Health Workers

Hawaii

Median salary
$58,450
Mean salary
$59,940
Employment
240
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$53,160
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into community health workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.