Skip to content
uswages .org

Community Health Workers Salary: New York vs California

Community Health Workers earn a median of $58,130 in New York and $58,050 in California. That is a nominal gap of $80 (+0.1%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$58,130
New York median
$53,863 after COL
$58,050
California median
$52,430 after COL
+0.1%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+2.7%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $80 more per year than California for community health workers, a gap of +0.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,434 of extra purchasing power (+2.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for community health workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Community Health Workers

New York

Median salary
$58,130
Mean salary
$62,140
Employment
5,800
Location quotient
1.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$53,863
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for New York →

Community Health Workers

California

Median salary
$58,050
Mean salary
$63,740
Employment
9,500
Location quotient
1.31
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$52,430
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into community health workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.