Skip to content
uswages .org

Community Health Workers Salary: New York vs New Hampshire

Community Health Workers earn a median of $58,130 in New York and $66,680 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $8,550 (-12.8%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$58,130
New York median
$53,863 after COL
$66,680
New Hampshire median
$64,014 after COL
-12.8%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-15.9%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $8,550 more per year than New York for community health workers, a gap of +12.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,150 of extra purchasing power (+15.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for community health workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Community Health Workers

New York

Median salary
$58,130
Mean salary
$62,140
Employment
5,800
Location quotient
1.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$53,863
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for New York →

Community Health Workers

New Hampshire

Median salary
$66,680
Mean salary
$62,320
Employment
200
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$64,014
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Community Health Workers page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into community health workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.