Skip to content
uswages .org

Compensation And Benefits Managers Salary: New York vs California

Compensation And Benefits Managers earn a median of $175,620 in New York and $166,730 in California. That is a nominal gap of $8,890 (+5.3%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$175,620
New York median
$162,730 after COL
$166,730
California median
$150,587 after COL
+5.3%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+8.1%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $8,890 more per year than California for compensation and benefits managers, a gap of +5.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,143 of extra purchasing power (+8.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for compensation and benefits managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Compensation And Benefits Managers

New York

Median salary
$175,620
Mean salary
$194,040
Employment
2,260
Location quotient
1.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$162,730
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Compensation And Benefits Managers page for New York →

Compensation And Benefits Managers

California

Median salary
$166,730
Mean salary
$180,130
Employment
2,970
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$150,587
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Compensation And Benefits Managers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into compensation and benefits managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.