Skip to content
uswages .org

Compliance Officers Salary: Massachusetts vs District of Columbia

Compliance Officers earn a median of $102,060 in Massachusetts and $111,030 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $8,970 (-8.1%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$102,060
Massachusetts median
$96,504 after COL
$111,030
District of Columbia median
$101,027 after COL
-8.1%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-4.5%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $8,970 more per year than Massachusetts for compliance officers, a gap of +8.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,523 of extra purchasing power (+4.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for compliance officers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Compliance Officers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$102,060
Mean salary
$108,310
Employment
13,190
Location quotient
1.35
Jobs per 1,000
3.6
COL-adjusted median
$96,504
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Compliance Officers page for Massachusetts →

Compliance Officers

District of Columbia

Median salary
$111,030
Mean salary
$113,410
Employment
4,380
Location quotient
2.33
Jobs per 1,000
6.2
COL-adjusted median
$101,027
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Compliance Officers page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into compliance officers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.