Skip to content
uswages .org

Computer Hardware Engineers Salary: Washington vs Massachusetts

Computer Hardware Engineers earn a median of $169,120 in Washington and $167,600 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $1,520 (+0.9%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$169,120
Washington median
$158,037 after COL
$167,600
Massachusetts median
$158,477 after COL
+0.9%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-0.3%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $1,520 more per year than Massachusetts for computer hardware engineers, a gap of +0.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Massachusetts actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $440 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for computer hardware engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Computer Hardware Engineers

Washington

Median salary
$169,120
Mean salary
$178,320
Employment
1,800
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$158,037
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Hardware Engineers page for Washington →

Computer Hardware Engineers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$167,600
Mean salary
$177,030
Employment
3,150
Location quotient
1.76
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$158,477
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Hardware Engineers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into computer hardware engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.