Skip to content
uswages .org

Computer Network Architects Salary: Washington vs California

Computer Network Architects earn a median of $168,070 in Washington and $158,870 in California. That is a nominal gap of $9,200 (+5.8%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$168,070
Washington median
$157,056 after COL
$158,870
California median
$143,488 after COL
+5.8%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+9.5%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $9,200 more per year than California for computer network architects, a gap of +5.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $13,568 of extra purchasing power (+9.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for computer network architects in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Computer Network Architects

Washington

Median salary
$168,070
Mean salary
$164,930
Employment
4,730
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$157,056
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Network Architects page for Washington →

Computer Network Architects

California

Median salary
$158,870
Mean salary
$161,350
Employment
14,870
Location quotient
0.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$143,488
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Network Architects page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into computer network architects from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.