Skip to content
uswages .org

Computer Programmers Salary: Arkansas vs Washington

Computer Programmers earn a median of $111,840 in Arkansas and $125,620 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $13,780 (-11.0%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$111,840
Arkansas median
$128,645 after COL
$125,620
Washington median
$117,388 after COL
-11.0%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+9.6%
Adjusted gap
Arkansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $13,780 more per year than Arkansas for computer programmers, a gap of +11.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Arkansas actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $11,257 more in national-price-level terms (a +9.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for computer programmers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Computer Programmers

Arkansas

Median salary
$111,840
Mean salary
$112,070
Employment
1,050
Location quotient
1.36
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$128,645
Regional Price Parity
86.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Programmers page for Arkansas →

Computer Programmers

Washington

Median salary
$125,620
Mean salary
$126,540
Employment
2,540
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$117,388
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Programmers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into computer programmers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.