Skip to content
uswages .org

Computer User Support Specialists Salary: Connecticut vs Massachusetts

Computer User Support Specialists earn a median of $70,210 in Connecticut and $75,070 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $4,860 (-6.5%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$70,210
Connecticut median
$67,764 after COL
$75,070
Massachusetts median
$70,983 after COL
-6.5%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-4.5%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $4,860 more per year than Connecticut for computer user support specialists, a gap of +6.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,220 of extra purchasing power (+4.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for computer user support specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Computer User Support Specialists

Connecticut

Median salary
$70,210
Mean salary
$72,960
Employment
9,300
Location quotient
1.19
Jobs per 1,000
5.5
COL-adjusted median
$67,764
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer User Support Specialists page for Connecticut →

Computer User Support Specialists

Massachusetts

Median salary
$75,070
Mean salary
$76,460
Employment
17,570
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
4.8
COL-adjusted median
$70,983
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer User Support Specialists page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into computer user support specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.