Skip to content
uswages .org

Conservation Scientists Salary: Jefferson City, MO vs Salem, OR

Conservation Scientists earn a median of $56,310 in Jefferson City, MO and $95,470 in Salem, OR. That is a nominal gap of $39,160 (-41.0%), with Salem, OR paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$56,310
Jefferson City, MO median
$64,007 after COL
$95,470
Salem, OR median
$92,109 after COL
-41.0%
Nominal gap
Salem, OR leads
-30.5%
Adjusted gap
Salem, OR leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Salem, OR pays $39,160 more per year than Jefferson City, MO for conservation scientists, a gap of +41.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Salem, OR still comes out ahead, with roughly $28,102 of extra purchasing power (+30.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for conservation scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Conservation Scientists

Jefferson City, MO

Median salary
$56,310
Mean salary
$59,160
Employment
220
Location quotient
16.28
Jobs per 1,000
2.7
COL-adjusted median
$64,007
Regional Price Parity
88.0%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Conservation Scientists page for Jefferson City, MO →

Conservation Scientists

Salem, OR

Median salary
$95,470
Mean salary
$93,780
Employment
90
Location quotient
2.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$92,109
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Conservation Scientists page for Salem, OR →

Related pages

Keep digging into conservation scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.