Skip to content
uswages .org

Conservation Scientists Salary: Tyler, TX vs Springfield, IL

Conservation Scientists earn a median of $69,880 in Tyler, TX and $107,990 in Springfield, IL. That is a nominal gap of $38,110 (-35.3%), with Springfield, IL paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$69,880
Tyler, TX median
$75,828 after COL
$107,990
Springfield, IL median
$116,438 after COL
-35.3%
Nominal gap
Springfield, IL leads
-34.9%
Adjusted gap
Springfield, IL leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Springfield, IL pays $38,110 more per year than Tyler, TX for conservation scientists, a gap of +35.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Springfield, IL still comes out ahead, with roughly $40,610 of extra purchasing power (+34.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for conservation scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Conservation Scientists

Tyler, TX

Median salary
$69,880
Mean salary
$70,640
Employment
70
Location quotient
3.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$75,828
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Conservation Scientists page for Tyler, TX →

Conservation Scientists

Springfield, IL

Median salary
$107,990
Mean salary
$105,360
Employment
40
Location quotient
2.22
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$116,438
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Conservation Scientists page for Springfield, IL →

Related pages

Keep digging into conservation scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.