Skip to content
uswages .org

Construction Managers Salary: Oregon vs California

Construction Managers earn a median of $131,420 in Oregon and $133,160 in California. That is a nominal gap of $1,740 (-1.3%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$131,420
Oregon median
$127,147 after COL
$133,160
California median
$120,267 after COL
-1.3%
Nominal gap
California leads
+5.7%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $1,740 more per year than Oregon for construction managers, a gap of +1.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oregon actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $6,879 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for construction managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Construction Managers

Oregon

Median salary
$131,420
Mean salary
$137,040
Employment
4,300
Location quotient
0.89
Jobs per 1,000
2.2
COL-adjusted median
$127,147
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Construction Managers page for Oregon →

Construction Managers

California

Median salary
$133,160
Mean salary
$141,670
Employment
34,750
Location quotient
0.78
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$120,267
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Construction Managers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into construction managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.