Skip to content
uswages .org

Construction Managers Salary: Washington vs New York

Construction Managers earn a median of $155,070 in Washington and $155,360 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $290 (-0.2%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$155,070
Washington median
$144,908 after COL
$155,360
New York median
$143,957 after COL
-0.2%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+0.7%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $290 more per year than Washington for construction managers, a gap of +0.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Washington actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $950 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for construction managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Construction Managers

Washington

Median salary
$155,070
Mean salary
$158,890
Employment
6,010
Location quotient
0.69
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$144,908
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Construction Managers page for Washington →

Construction Managers

New York

Median salary
$155,360
Mean salary
$159,510
Employment
10,280
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$143,957
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Construction Managers page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into construction managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.