Skip to content
uswages .org

Continuous Mining Machine Operators Salary: Nevada vs Wyoming

Continuous Mining Machine Operators earn a median of $85,590 in Nevada and $85,260 in Wyoming. That is a nominal gap of $330 (+0.4%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$85,590
Nevada median
$85,608 after COL
$85,260
Wyoming median
$91,983 after COL
+0.4%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-6.9%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $330 more per year than Wyoming for continuous mining machine operators, a gap of +0.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wyoming actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $6,375 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for continuous mining machine operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Continuous Mining Machine Operators

Nevada

Median salary
$85,590
Mean salary
$83,490
Employment
1,110
Location quotient
7.95
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$85,608
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Continuous Mining Machine Operators page for Nevada →

Continuous Mining Machine Operators

Wyoming

Median salary
$85,260
Mean salary
$94,630
Employment
330
Location quotient
13.03
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$91,983
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Continuous Mining Machine Operators page for Wyoming →

Related pages

Keep digging into continuous mining machine operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.