Skip to content
uswages .org

Conveyor Operators And Tenders Salary: Kansas vs Wyoming

Conveyor Operators And Tenders earn a median of $40,030 in Kansas and $52,480 in Wyoming. That is a nominal gap of $12,450 (-23.7%), with Wyoming paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$40,030
Kansas median
$44,444 after COL
$52,480
Wyoming median
$56,618 after COL
-23.7%
Nominal gap
Wyoming leads
-21.5%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wyoming pays $12,450 more per year than Kansas for conveyor operators and tenders, a gap of +23.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wyoming still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,174 of extra purchasing power (+21.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for conveyor operators and tenders in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Conveyor Operators And Tenders

Kansas

Median salary
$40,030
Mean salary
$43,850
Employment
840
Location quotient
3.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$44,444
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Conveyor Operators And Tenders page for Kansas →

Conveyor Operators And Tenders

Wyoming

Median salary
$52,480
Mean salary
$69,660
Employment
120
Location quotient
2.94
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$56,618
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Conveyor Operators And Tenders page for Wyoming →

Related pages

Keep digging into conveyor operators and tenders from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.