Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, All Other Salary: North Dakota vs Indiana

Cooks, All Other earn a median of $44,190 in North Dakota and $44,290 in Indiana. That is a nominal gap of $100 (-0.2%), with Indiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,190
North Dakota median
$49,675 after COL
$44,290
Indiana median
$47,456 after COL
-0.2%
Nominal gap
Indiana leads
+4.7%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Indiana pays $100 more per year than North Dakota for cooks, all other, a gap of +0.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. North Dakota actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,219 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, All Other

North Dakota

Median salary
$44,190
Mean salary
$46,200
Employment
60
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$49,675
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, All Other page for North Dakota →

Cooks, All Other

Indiana

Median salary
$44,290
Mean salary
$47,000
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.09
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$47,456
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, All Other page for Indiana →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.