Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, All Other Salary: Washington vs Missouri

Cooks, All Other earn a median of $52,510 in Washington and $43,990 in Missouri. That is a nominal gap of $8,520 (+19.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$52,510
Washington median
$49,069 after COL
$43,990
Missouri median
$48,438 after COL
+19.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+1.3%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $8,520 more per year than Missouri for cooks, all other, a gap of +19.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $631 of extra purchasing power (+1.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, All Other

Washington

Median salary
$52,510
Mean salary
$52,420
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.32
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$49,069
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, All Other page for Washington →

Cooks, All Other

Missouri

Median salary
$43,990
Mean salary
$44,860
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$48,438
Regional Price Parity
90.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, All Other page for Missouri →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.