Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, Fast Food Salary: Jacksonville, NC vs Napa, CA

Cooks, Fast Food earn a median of $22,900 in Jacksonville, NC and $45,300 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $22,400 (-49.4%), with Napa, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$22,900
Jacksonville, NC median
$24,868 after COL
$45,300
Napa, CA median
$40,247 after COL
-49.4%
Nominal gap
Napa, CA leads
-38.2%
Adjusted gap
Napa, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Napa, CA pays $22,400 more per year than Jacksonville, NC for cooks, fast food, a gap of +49.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Napa, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,379 of extra purchasing power (+38.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, fast food in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Fast Food

Jacksonville, NC

Median salary
$22,900
Mean salary
$24,440
Employment
1,830
Location quotient
8.45
Jobs per 1,000
34.8
COL-adjusted median
$24,868
Regional Price Parity
92.1%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Cooks, Fast Food page for Jacksonville, NC →

Cooks, Fast Food

Napa, CA

Median salary
$45,300
Mean salary
$43,910
Employment
370
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
4.7
COL-adjusted median
$40,247
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Cooks, Fast Food page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, fast food from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.