Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, Fast Food Salary: New Hampshire vs Hawaii

Cooks, Fast Food earn a median of $38,590 in New Hampshire and $48,120 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $9,530 (-19.8%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$38,590
New Hampshire median
$37,047 after COL
$48,120
Hawaii median
$43,765 after COL
-19.8%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-15.4%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $9,530 more per year than New Hampshire for cooks, fast food, a gap of +19.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,718 of extra purchasing power (+15.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, fast food in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Fast Food

New Hampshire

Median salary
$38,590
Mean salary
$40,390
Employment
1,330
Location quotient
0.47
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$37,047
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Fast Food page for New Hampshire →

Cooks, Fast Food

Hawaii

Median salary
$48,120
Mean salary
$41,670
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$43,765
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Fast Food page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, fast food from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.