Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, Fast Food Salary: Oregon vs California

Cooks, Fast Food earn a median of $37,880 in Oregon and $42,050 in California. That is a nominal gap of $4,170 (-9.9%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,880
Oregon median
$36,648 after COL
$42,050
California median
$37,979 after COL
-9.9%
Nominal gap
California leads
-3.5%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $4,170 more per year than Oregon for cooks, fast food, a gap of +9.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,330 of extra purchasing power (+3.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, fast food in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Fast Food

Oregon

Median salary
$37,880
Mean salary
$39,310
Employment
4,300
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
2.2
COL-adjusted median
$36,648
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Fast Food page for Oregon →

Cooks, Fast Food

California

Median salary
$42,050
Mean salary
$41,490
Employment
124,440
Location quotient
1.66
Jobs per 1,000
6.8
COL-adjusted median
$37,979
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Fast Food page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, fast food from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.