Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, Restaurant Salary: District of Columbia vs Washington

Cooks, Restaurant earn a median of $46,130 in District of Columbia and $46,800 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $670 (-1.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,130
District of Columbia median
$41,974 after COL
$46,800
Washington median
$43,733 after COL
-1.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-4.0%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $670 more per year than District of Columbia for cooks, restaurant, a gap of +1.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,759 of extra purchasing power (+4.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, restaurant in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Restaurant

District of Columbia

Median salary
$46,130
Mean salary
$45,570
Employment
7,720
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
11.0
COL-adjusted median
$41,974
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Restaurant page for District of Columbia →

Cooks, Restaurant

Washington

Median salary
$46,800
Mean salary
$47,200
Employment
35,140
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
9.9
COL-adjusted median
$43,733
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Restaurant page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, restaurant from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.