Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, Restaurant Salary: Nevada vs Vermont

Cooks, Restaurant earn a median of $38,610 in Nevada and $45,390 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $6,780 (-14.9%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$38,610
Nevada median
$38,618 after COL
$45,390
Vermont median
$46,336 after COL
-14.9%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-16.7%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $6,780 more per year than Nevada for cooks, restaurant, a gap of +14.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,718 of extra purchasing power (+16.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, restaurant in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Restaurant

Nevada

Median salary
$38,610
Mean salary
$42,130
Employment
27,250
Location quotient
1.94
Jobs per 1,000
17.6
COL-adjusted median
$38,618
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Restaurant page for Nevada →

Cooks, Restaurant

Vermont

Median salary
$45,390
Mean salary
$43,680
Employment
2,360
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
7.8
COL-adjusted median
$46,336
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Restaurant page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, restaurant from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.