Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, Restaurant Salary: Vermont vs Washington

Cooks, Restaurant earn a median of $45,390 in Vermont and $46,800 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $1,410 (-3.0%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,390
Vermont median
$46,336 after COL
$46,800
Washington median
$43,733 after COL
-3.0%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+6.0%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $1,410 more per year than Vermont for cooks, restaurant, a gap of +3.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,603 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, restaurant in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Restaurant

Vermont

Median salary
$45,390
Mean salary
$43,680
Employment
2,360
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
7.8
COL-adjusted median
$46,336
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Restaurant page for Vermont →

Cooks, Restaurant

Washington

Median salary
$46,800
Mean salary
$47,200
Employment
35,140
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
9.9
COL-adjusted median
$43,733
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Restaurant page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, restaurant from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.