Skip to content
uswages .org

Cooks, Short Order Salary: Colorado vs Washington

Cooks, Short Order earn a median of $42,450 in Colorado and $42,760 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $310 (-0.7%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$42,450
Colorado median
$41,193 after COL
$42,760
Washington median
$39,958 after COL
-0.7%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+3.1%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $310 more per year than Colorado for cooks, short order, a gap of +0.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Colorado actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,235 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, short order in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Short Order

Colorado

Median salary
$42,450
Mean salary
$44,170
Employment
1,900
Location quotient
0.74
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$41,193
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Short Order page for Colorado →

Cooks, Short Order

Washington

Median salary
$42,760
Mean salary
$43,990
Employment
1,700
Location quotient
0.54
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$39,958
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Short Order page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, short order from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.